International

Neither approved nor disapproved, Supreme Court clarifies stance on Form 6 alterations

Neither approved nor disapproved, Supreme Court clarifies stance on Form 6 alterations
Photo credit: The Hindu
BLOs distribute enumerations forms during a SIR drive. Photo used for representation purpose only.
Photo credit: The Hindu

BLOs distribute enumerations forms during a SIR drive. Photo used for representation purpose only. | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Monday (October 12, 2026) clarified that it had neither approved nor disapproved the controversial alterations made to Form 6 in its May 27 judgment, which was entirely about the legality of the pilot Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process in Bihar.

The Court said the May 27 ruling pre-dated the changes made to Form 6.

Anti-CEC row LIVE updates

The changes and modified declarations, which required applicants to provide ancestry details or linkage to previous SIR rolls on the ECINet portal, were introduced subsequently in July.

“When the Bihar SIR issue was heard and decided, the new Form 6 was not there. The new Form 6 was neither approved nor disapproved by us. But we will examine it now,” Justice Joymalya Bagchi, who is part of the Bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, observed orally.

Photo credit: The Hindu

The remarks came in response to a petition filed by Priya Mishra against the Union government challenging the alterations made to Form 6 to register new voters during the SIR exercises undertaken across multiple States.

Originally published by The Hindu on Oct 12, 2026 Read the full article at thehindu.com
Read original
About this page. The Ditible is an aggregator. This article was imported from a publisher feed and may have been reformatted. Copyright remains with the original publisher, and the headline, image and any quoted text are used for attribution and indexing purposes. Source links are preserved on every item in the archive.
Share

Comments

0 comments

No comments yet — be the first.

More from The Hindu

View source

Related