US-Iran Deal Framework: A draft framework for a potential deal between the US and Iran has been suggested that would seek to address several of the major obstacles standing in the way of the resumption of talks. It includes moving Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium to another country or diluting it, reopening the Strait of Hormuz to the international traffic after just seven days of an agreement, and easing economic sanctions against Tehran.
As Al Arabiya English reports, based on information received from sources about the draft, the proposed framework also takes into account a possible role of China as a guarantor of the agreement’s fulfillment by both sides. The proposal prefers direct talks between the US and Iran in Doha, Qatar, rather than Istanbul.
Nevertheless, this is merely a draft proposal, not an accepted deal. Its success would depend on the readiness of Washington and Tehran to make concessions to each other.
You Might Be Interested In
US-Iran Deal Framework: What Does The Draft Propose?
The reported framework focuses on Iran’s nuclear programme, maritime security and the economic restrictions imposed by the United States.
One of its key proposals is to transfer Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile to another country. An alternative option would be to reduce the uranium’s enrichment level. Both measures would aim to address US concerns about Iran’s nuclear activities.
The proposal also calls for the Strait of Hormuz to reopen to international shipping within seven days of an initial understanding. The waterway is a major route for global oil and gas supplies, making its reopening an important part of any effort to reduce regional tensions.
In return for steps by Iran on its nuclear programme and maritime security, the US could consider easing sanctions, the blockade and other economic restrictions affecting Tehran.
Could China Act As A Guarantor?
The draft reportedly considers China as a possible guarantor of the arrangement. Such a role could help provide assurances that the commitments made by both countries are implemented and maintained.
The framework also proposes an independent verification mechanism before each phase of the agreement. This would allow the parties to confirm that the other side has fulfilled its obligations before moving to the next stage.






Comments
0 commentsNo comments yet — be the first.